Pemra issues show-cause notice to ARY for airing ‘fake news’ regarding envoy’s stance on cablegate – Pakistan

Pakistan Electronic Media Regulatory Authority (Pemra) announced on Friday ari news For broadcasting “fake/unconfirmed news” based on unofficial sources about the position of former Pakistani Ambassador to the United States Assad Majid on the Cablegate controversy.

The cable in question refers to a statement sent by Majeed, which claimed that former Prime Minister Imran Khan continued to contain evidence of a plot to overthrow his government. The NSC convened a cable meeting yesterday. A meeting for the NSC to review the content of the cable was held for the second time in months. Former US ambassadors were also present at the meeting to testify.

According to the show cause notice, a copy is provided with: Serb.comThe channel broadcast news about the ambassador’s position at the meeting on Friday at 6:52pm.

According to the comments cited in the notice, ari news Majeed, citing sources at an NSC meeting, argued that the content of the cable constituted interference in internal affairs, that threatening language was used on the cable, and that the ambassador claimed that it was “reality” that the ambassador held his position steadfast despite the government. I did. enter.

Pemra said that airing “fake/unconfirmed news” that doesn’t take Majeed’s point of view and cites unofficial sources “appears to be a deliberate move”. ari news It’s like slandering a state institution.”

In addition, “This act is against the existing media ethics despite the announcement of the NSC’s official statement.” ari news “We are relying on unofficial sources that are intended to mislead viewers.”

The broadcast of fake news and unverified content has raised serious concerns about the performance of the channel editorial board and the gatekeeping tools adopted, he added.

“Such fake/unconfirmed news broadcasts [is] It is a complete violation of section 20(f) of the Pemra Act 2002 as amended. [by] Pemra (Amended) Act, 2007 read as verses 3(1)(i,k), 4(1), 4(2), 4(4), 4(7), 4(10), 5, 17 and 24 The 2015 Code of Conduct for Electronic Media (Programs and Advertising) and the 2018 Supreme Court Order of the Supreme Court of Pakistan in Suo Moto Case No.

It directed the Chief Executive Officer of ARY Communications Ltd to explain in writing within 7 days the reasons for the need for legal action, including fines, suspensions and license revocations pursuant to paragraphs 29 and 30 and other enabling provisions of Pemra Ordinance 2002. It won’t start.

In addition, the CEO, along with a written response, was directed to attend a personal hearing, either directly or through an authorized representative, at 11:30 am on April 29 at 11:30 am at Pemra’s Islamabad headquarters.

“Non-compliance will result in non-party legal action against Licensee in accordance with the relevant provisions of the Pemra law,” he warned.

‘Negative Politics’

Meanwhile, PTI Chairman Fawad Chaudhry said Friday that the pressures faced by ARY Chairman Salman Iqbal “is not out of the ordinary”. “The ARY team must have the nerves of theft to defy all pressure and face the truth,” he said.

Information Minister Marriyum Aurangzeb issued a statement rejecting the “misleading” claims. ari news Although she didn’t reveal the name of the channel she was talking about.

She said the ambassador made a statement at the NSC meeting and reviewed the content and context of the cable. Aurangzeb said publishing such news after the ambassador’s position, intentions and views were clearly articulated constitutes “negative politics”.

“To lie like the news is to point a knife at Pakistan’s national interest,” said the intelligence minister.

The Ministry of Foreign Affairs also responded to the incident. The ambassador said he had briefed the NSC about the context and content of the cable and shared his professional assessment. “His briefing and evaluation were accurately reflected in the statement issued after today’s NSC meeting,” the FO added.

cable gate

After Imran was ousted from the National Assembly through a vote of no confidence, the Shehbaz government was dissolved, calling it an “imported” government.

The former prime minister claimed that the information he received from the ambassador on March 7, a day before the opposition party officially submitted a measure of no confidence in him, was a foreign conspiracy. plot.

Imran claimed that the cable showed that Pakistan was threatened by a US diplomat who said the country must face consequences if it is not removed through a then-submitted no-confidence motion.

“How did they know before the no-confidence consent was filed?” Imran has called on alleged supporters at several public rallies over the past few weeks, adding that local agitators have conspired with “foreign backers” to succeed in the alleged conspiracy.

The issue was first raised by Imran at a public rally on March 27, four days before the first NSC meeting to review cable content.

Since then, Imran has mentioned this cable in several public speeches when talking about a plot to remove him from power.

In one of his speeches, Imran said Cable conveyed details of the US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia and the ambassador’s allegation that the US Assistant Secretary of State for South and Central Asia, Donald Lu, threatened Pakistan.

Majeed said on cable that Lu had warned that Imran’s retention of prime minister would affect relations between the two countries. Imran argued that the US was annoyed with his “independent foreign policy” and his visit to Moscow.

The decision to reject the proposal of no confidence in former Prime Minister Imran on the 3rd of April, Kasim Suri, vice chairman of the National Assembly, was also made based on this telegram, which he saw as evidence of the conspiracy to oust Imran. This resolution was due to pass legislation that contradicts Article 5 of the Constitution, which would mandate allegiance to the state for all citizens.

Suri’s decision was later annulled by the Supreme Court, and on April 10, when a resolution of no confidence was passed, Im Ran was dismissed from the prime minister’s office.

Further reporting by Naveed Siddiqui.